For years lawyers have been
taking clients’ money to argue that the trusts were void because the banks did
not comply with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement. We have
always told potential clients to save their money because this was a losing
argument because homeowners do not have standing to enforce the pooling and
servicing agreements. The Second Circuit has now definitively
decided the issue against homeowners in Rajamin v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust
Co.
SEE DECISION BELOW
No comments:
Post a Comment